Share this article:
The Shack is a well-written 'Christian fiction' book by William P. Young that has sold over 20 million copies since its debut in 2007.
Due to the intense story, for most readers it causes a flood of emotions to well up inside, masking the theological errors throughout the book.
- The Shack: Directed by Stuart Hazeldine. With Sam Worthington, Octavia Spencer, Tim McGraw, Radha Mitchell. A grieving man receives a mysterious, personal invitation to meet with God at a place called 'The Shack.'
- Mar 12, 2017 Octavia Spencer (R) plays God in the film 'The Shack,' in theaters March 3, 2017. (Photo: theshack.movie) McGraw said he believes 'The Shack' can be used as a 'tool' to help others on their life journey, adding that the universal themes of 'love, compassion, and forgiveness' are all present in the movie.
- The Shack is a novel by Canadian author William P. Young that was published in 2007. The novel was self-published but became a USA Today bestseller, having sold 1 million copies as of June 8, 2008.
After suffering a tragic loss, Mack Phillips seeks answers from a mysterious letter urging him to visit a deserted shack in the Oregon wilderness. Watch trailers & learn more. The Shack is a well-written 'Christian fiction' book by William P. Young that has sold over 20 million copies since its debut in 2007. Due to the intense story, for most readers it causes a flood of emotions to well up inside, masking the theological errors throughout the book. We didn't recommend reading the book when we reviewed it it 2008 (1.
We didn't recommend reading the book when we reviewed it it 2008 (1), nor do we recommend seeing the movie that is coming out in March. Here's why:
Although The Shack is a fiction book, it attempts to address significant theological issues. But the answers given to these issues are in grave Biblical error. And more often than not, these errors go undetected by most Christians. Here are some of them...
The Shack presents an unbiblical picture of God: God the Father is personified by a large black lady named Papa.
I could stop there, as most Believers see the blasphemous problems with making God into a woman-which basically is goddess worship. But there's much more.
The Bible never teaches that God the Father takes on a physical form. Just the opposite.
'God is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.' John 4:24
'...who alone possesses immortality and dwells in unapproachable light, whom no manhas seen or can see.' 1Tim. 6:16
Even though God the Father is shown to possess both male and female attributes, the Bible always refers to God in the masculine gender, never female.
On page 95, 'Papa' has scars in her hands. But, of course, only Christ bore the sins of the world. God the Father rendered judgment to His Son.
The Shack presents an unbiblical picture of the Holy Spirit: God the Holy Spirit is personified by an Asian woman. But the Holy Spirit never appears as a person, much less a woman, and is always referred to in the masculine gender.
The Shack presents an unbiblical picture of Jesus: Jesus of The Shack is not Jesus of the Bible!
'...for God is not a God of confusion...' 1Cor. 14:33
There are several verses in the Bible where Jesus exercised His headship, His divine attributes. But on pages 99-100 it says, 'Jesus as a human being had no power within himself to heal anyone.' And this is, of course, 100% false. Jesus was 100% God and 100% man.
The Shack presents an unbiblical picture of the Trinity: The Shack presents all three members of the Trinity in human form, but the Bible shows only Jesus taking human form.
The Shack says on page 122-124 that the Trinity is all equal, that they don't relate to each other within a hierarchy. But the Bible says clearly that God sent His Son. The Son did not send Himself. So while the members of the Trinity are all equal, there is also a divine order of headship and submission, which is hierarchy.
'No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; John 6:44
'But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is thehead of a woman, and God is the head of Christ.' 1Cor. 11:3
The Shack presents an unbiblical picture of salvation: The Shack suggests there is more than one way to be saved. Basically, it teaches pluralism. The book states on page 182, with regards to salvation:
'Those who love me come from every system that exists. They are Buddhists orMormons... Muslims,'
The Bible disagrees:
'Jesus said to him, I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Fatherbut through Me.' John 14:6
While it IS possible that a Mormon or Muslim could get saved, they wouldn't stay in the Mormon or Muslim faith. But The Shack suggests that those in the faith are indistinguishable ... no difference. Even adding:
'I have no desire to make them Christian.'
And then it goes on to say:
'Does that mean all roads will lead to you?'
To which Jesus says:
'Most roads don't lead anywhere.'
Of course, the Jesus of the Bible disagrees:
'Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads todestruction, and there are many who enter through it.' Matt. 7:13
'Jesus said to him, 'I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Fatherbut through Me.' John 14:6
Yet The Shack doesn't tell people they should seek the only way to avoid eternal damnation--believing Jesus was God, came to earth, lived a sinless life, was crucified, and defeated death by rising from the dead.
The Shack presents an unbiblical picture of your relationship with God: Throughout the book, The Shack places an emphasis on your 'relationship' with God while downplaying proper doctrine. But how can you have a true relationship with God without scripturally understanding God's truth as revealed in His Word?
'...until we all attain to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to amature man, to the measure of the stature which belongs to the fullness of Christ.' Eph.4:13
The Shack embraces Pantheism: Pantheism is the false teaching that God is everything and everything is God. Trees, rocks, animals, the sun, pets, people...are all gods. But even though God may live in a person or be present in a rock, that doesn't mean He is a person or a rock.
Don't confuse this with God being 'omnipresent.' God is not immersed in the fabric of everything, God is present in all time and space. Noted New Ager Benjamin Creme wrote in his book, 'The Reappearance of the Christ and the Masters of Wisdom':
But eventually a new world religion will be inaugurated which will be a fusionand synthesis of the approach of the East and the approach of the West. TheChrist will bring together, not simply Christianity and Buddhism, but the conceptof God transcendent-outside of His creation-and also the concept of Godimmanent in all creation-in man and all creation. p. 88
The Shack also teaches the New Age principle that 'God is in everything.'
'God, who is the ground of all being, dwells in, around, and through all things.'p. 112
This is the same garbage that Rick Warren teaches in his blasphemous 'The Purpose Driven Life':
'He rules everything and is everywhere and is in everything.' p. 88
If pantheism were true, it would not be a sin to worship the sun, moon or stars because they would, in fact, be God. But the Bible forbids it.
'You shall have no other gods before Me.' Deut. 5:7
'And beware not to lift up your eyes to heaven and see the sun and the moon and thestars, all the host of heaven, and be drawn away and worship them and serve them...'Deut. 4:19
Funny thing, when you think about it. The same lie Satan used in the Garden of Eden, 'You can be God,' is still being used by Satan today!
Conclusion While a mature Believer may be able to read the fiction book and/or watch the fiction movie without being compromised, we believe that the dangerous theological errors in The Shack are from the pit of hell.
Reading and/or seeing The Shack movie by a mature Believer could expose less mature Believers to major Biblical error. What could have been an interesting story is actually playing with fire (i.e. Satan), which is never acceptable.
'Be of sober spirit, be on the alert. Your adversary, the devil, prowls around like aroaring lion, seeking someone to devour.' 1Pet. 5:8
Shalom! BP
(1) https://compass.org/store/products/Article%3A-The-Shack-%252d-Book- Review.html
If you would like to print this article click here: Why the Shack is Blasphemous
Share this article:
We cannot remove the wrath of God from Scripture. It is as surely a part of His character as His love and mercy are. But God’s wrath is not a human anger that flares up because of wounded pride or envy. His wrath is not self-indulgent, but rather, as theologian J.I. Packer says in his book Knowing God, “a right and necessary reaction to objective moral evil. God is only angry where anger is called for. . . . all God’s indignation is righteous.”
The Shack Movie Controversy
The Bible is very clear about why Jesus came to earth, humbly taking on the very nature of a servant (see John 3:16-18, Philippians 2:6-7). Jesus Himself warned about the coming judgment and hell, commissioning His followers to proclaim the Gospel that the lost might be saved—that they might choose life (see Matthew 25:31-46, Revelation 21:6-8). Ultimately, that is what every person must do: Either choose salvation through the atoning blood of Jesus or choose the wrath of the righteous God.
The Shack Movie Trailer
Would Mack really want a God who would not punish evil? Would he be okay with a God who would not exert justice for the evil done to his daughter? Would God be good and loving if He said to Mack, “We’ll just let this slide”? Of course not. He shows us His love by both punishing sin and providing us with an escape: “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8). He is “the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished” (Exodus 34:6-7).